Legal Opinion

Anderson v. McCoy

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

*843OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter E. Corning, J.

Respondent has made motions to dismiss the above-captioned matters based on jurisdictional grounds. For purposes of this motion, these matters have been consolidated into one decision. Petitioners have been granted poor person status pursuant to CPLR 1101.

Respondent moves to dismiss these petitions for lack of proper service and failure to properly commence the proceeding. It is respondent’s argument that the failure of these three petitioners to personally serve the Attorney General’s regional office with these petitions has resulted in a lack of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Boag v. MacDougallSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Sackinger v. NevinsNew York Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API