Anderson v. McCoy
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*843OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter E. Corning, J.
Respondent has made motions to dismiss the above-captioned matters based on jurisdictional grounds. For purposes of this motion, these matters have been consolidated into one decision. Petitioners have been granted poor person status pursuant to CPLR 1101.
Respondent moves to dismiss these petitions for lack of proper service and failure to properly commence the proceeding. It is respondent’s argument that the failure of these three petitioners to personally serve the Attorney General’s regional office with these petitions has resulted in a lack of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boag v. MacDougallSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sackinger v. NevinsNew York Supreme Court · 1982