Legal Opinion

Chapin v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1902PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Orange County. The facts of the caise are stated in the ¡opinion of the Court.

1Per curiam

Defendant in error sued plaintiff in error as executors of Horace E. Chapin, deceased, and obtained judgment, and the latter sued! out writ of error. The declaration contained a count that the deceased Horace E. Chapin in his lifetime became indebted to plaintiff in the ¡sum of $¡300 for services rendered 'by him to said Chapin at his request and which he promised to pay, but failed to do so, and which defendants also failed to pay on request. There were also other common counts.

The bill of particulars' was for service rendered to H‘. E. Chapin by E. A. Mitchell in attending-, nursing and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holliday v. McKinneSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  2. Robinson v. Dibble's AdministratorSupreme Court of Florida · 1880
  3. Lewis v. MeginnissSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  4. Higgs v. SheheeSupreme Court of Florida · 1852
  5. Belote v. O'Brian's AdministratorSupreme Court of Florida · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Embrey v. Southern Gas & Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Kilmer v. GustasonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  3. Madison v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. Hulsh v. HulshDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. DoodyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API