Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 12, 1938No. 30PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The petitioners, husband and wife, elected to file a single joint return for the year 1933, as they were privileged to do by virtue of section 51(b) of the Revenue Act Of 1932, 47 Stat. 188, 26 U.S.C.A. § 51(b). Mr. Pierce realized a profit of nearly $55,-000 from the sale during 1933 of securities which were not “capital assets” as defined in section 101, 47 Stat. 191, 192, 26 U.S.C. A. § 101 note; that is to say, the securities so sold had not been held by him for more than two years. During the same year Mrs. Pierce sustained a loss of $3,646.78 in selling securities…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gummey v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
  2. Van Vleck v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. Commissioner v. BrumderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  4. Commissioner v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  5. Hill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sweet v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  2. Commissioner v. RabenoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. Sweet v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939
  4. Demuth v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  5. Janney v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API