Tatum v. Freeman
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Concurrence
For the reasons explained in the review of Jones v. Kennedy,890 So.2d 975 (Ala. 2004), and Ex parte Alabama Institute forDeaf Blind, 578 So.2d 1308 (Ala. 1991), in Part III of the main opinion, I agree that, at this juncture, Tatum's request to obtain judicial review by means of a common-law writ of certiorari is premature. Furthermore, viewed in the light of that prematurity, the circumstances presented by Tatum do not provide a basis for the declaratory or injunctive relief requested by Tatum or for the relief she requests by means of a writ of mandamus. It is for this reason that I concur…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ex Parte Ala. Inst. for Deaf and BlindSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Jones v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 2004