Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Tatum v. Freeman

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 11, 2004No. 2021133Published

1Concurrence

For the reasons explained in the review of Jones v. Kennedy,890 So.2d 975 (Ala. 2004), and Ex parte Alabama Institute forDeaf Blind, 578 So.2d 1308 (Ala. 1991), in Part III of the main opinion, I agree that, at this juncture, Tatum's request to obtain judicial review by means of a common-law writ of certiorari is premature. Furthermore, viewed in the light of that prematurity, the circumstances presented by Tatum do not provide a basis for the declaratory or injunctive relief requested by Tatum or for the relief she requests by means of a writ of mandamus. It is for this reason that I concur…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Ala. Inst. for Deaf and BlindSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Jones v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API