Legal Opinion

State v. Laine

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 2006No. A03-1551PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.

Brett Arnold Laine appeals from his conviction of first-degree domestic abuse murder. Laine requests a reversal of his conviction based on insufficient evidence. In the alternative, alleging error on several grounds, Laine seeks a new trial. Because sufficient evidence sustains the murder conviction and there is no error warranting a new trial, we affirm.

*428This direct appeal arises out of the death of Laine’s girlfriend, Nancy Jagu-nich. Around 3:20 a.m. on October 1, 2001, Laine called 911 and reported that his girlfriend had fallen down the stairs and was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. State v. LeakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. State v. CrowsbreastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. State v. CrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. State v. YangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. State v. GoelzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State v. HokansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API