State v. Laine
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
Brett Arnold Laine appeals from his conviction of first-degree domestic abuse murder. Laine requests a reversal of his conviction based on insufficient evidence. In the alternative, alleging error on several grounds, Laine seeks a new trial. Because sufficient evidence sustains the murder conviction and there is no error warranting a new trial, we affirm.
*428This direct appeal arises out of the death of Laine’s girlfriend, Nancy Jagu-nich. Around 3:20 a.m. on October 1, 2001, Laine called 911 and reported that his girlfriend had fallen down the stairs and was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. LeakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. CrowsbreastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. CrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. YangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. GoelzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. HokansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.