Legal Opinion

Johnson v. King

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided March 27, 2012No. 2011-CP-00199-COAPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Today’s case stems from the South Mississippi Correctional Institution’s (SMCI) decision to confiscate all inmates’ 16-ounce opaque drinking mugs, including one belonging to inmate Zachary Johnson. The decision was based on prison officials finding multiple inmates, other than Johnson, had altered the drinking mugs to conceal cell phones, cell phone parts, or drugs. The drinking mugs were deemed a security risk, classified as contraband, and confiscated from all SMCI inmates. On or about May 21, 2010, Johnson submitted a request for administrative remedy through…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Edwards v. BookerMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  3. City of Vicksburg v. HermanMississippi Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Allen v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1997
  5. Robinson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Craig Steve Bentrup v. Christopher EppsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014
  2. Bobby E. Wilson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections and Gia McLeodCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2023
  3. Cannady v. WoodallDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2021
  4. Carrothers v. Disciplinary Hearing OfficeDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2025
  5. Daylon Carl Waldrop v. Supt. Chris Loden, et al.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2026

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API