Hallums v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceGlickman, Associate Judge
I would hold that the trial judge did not err, constitutionally or otherwise, in admitting Officer Lee’s identification of appellant.
Officer Lee was with Officer Barriek when they saw a woman enter Lord & Taylor and begin removing Coach handbags from a counter top display. According to Officer Barriek, Officer Lee “immediately” declared, “That’s Theresa Hallums.” In my view, Officer Lee’s declaration was a statement of “present sense impression” as defined in Federal Rule of Evidence 803(1): “A statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.