West Suburban Bank v. City of West Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman
In this case, plaintiff, West Suburban Bank, contests the involuntary annexation of six parcels of land under section 7 — 1—13 of the Illinois Municipal Code (Code) (65 ILCS 5/7 — 1—13 (West 2002)). On appeal, plaintiff maintains that defendant, the City of West Chicago, failed to comply with section 7 — 1—13, because the property annexed (1) exceeded the 60-acre statutory limitation and (2) was not “wholly bounded.” We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
On November 3, 2003, defendant adopted ordinance No. 03 — 0— 0105 (West Chicago Municipal Code § 03 — 0—0105 (eff. November 3, 2003)) pursuant to section 7…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Land v. Board of Educ. of City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Elementary School District 159 v. SchillerIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Village of Chatham v. County of SangamonIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Magnus v. Lutheran General Health Care SystemAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- NDC LLC v. TopinkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- People v. Randall M.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Bowers v. City of RockfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Bowers v. City of RockfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- In re Randall M.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.