Legal Opinion

West Suburban Bank v. City of West Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 28, 2006No. 2-05-0794PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman

In this case, plaintiff, West Suburban Bank, contests the involuntary annexation of six parcels of land under section 7 — 1—13 of the Illinois Municipal Code (Code) (65 ILCS 5/7 — 1—13 (West 2002)). On appeal, plaintiff maintains that defendant, the City of West Chicago, failed to comply with section 7 — 1—13, because the property annexed (1) exceeded the 60-acre statutory limitation and (2) was not “wholly bounded.” We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

On November 3, 2003, defendant adopted ordinance No. 03 — 0— 0105 (West Chicago Municipal Code § 03 — 0—0105 (eff. November 3, 2003)) pursuant to section 7…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Land v. Board of Educ. of City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Elementary School District 159 v. SchillerIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Village of Chatham v. County of SangamonIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Magnus v. Lutheran General Health Care SystemAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. NDC LLC v. TopinkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. People v. Randall M.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Bowers v. City of RockfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. Bowers v. City of RockfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. In re Randall M.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API