Legal Opinion

Davis v. Alpha Portland Cement Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided January 23, 1905No. 46PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

This suit is brought to recover damages for the defendant’s admitted failure to deliver cement in accordance with the contract contained in the following letters:

“December 21, 1901.
“Messrs. James A. Davis & Co., Boston, Mass. — Dear Sirs: Below we beg to confirm our verbal understanding had with your Mr. James A. Davis and Mr. Henry N. Fisher and our Mr. Gerstell in New York city on the 9th and 10th insts. viz.:
“In consideration of our agreeing to give you the exclusive sale of our Alpha Portland Cement in the New England States during the year 1902, you agree…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Grand Tower Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Sheffield Furnace Co. v. Hull Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. A. J. Neimeyer Lumber Co. v. Burlington & Missouri River RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Capehart v. Furman Farm Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meyer v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Hurst v. Altamont Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Delmont Gas Coal Co. v. Diamond Alkali Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Douglas Fir Exploitation & Export Co. v. ComynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API