Legal Opinion
MacLeod v. Commonwealth Capital Funding Corp.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided September 14, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.
Plaintiffs Murdo and Jocelyn MacLeod (the “MacLeods”) brought this action against two corporations, Commonwealth Capital Funding Corporation (“Commonwealth”) and Constitution Financial Group, Inc. (“Constitution”), to recover damages against each defendant for deceit and violation of the Consumer Protection Act, G.L.c. 93A. Commonwealth defaulted. After trial, Constitution was found liable under G.L.c. 93A for single damages in the amount of $3,500.00, plus attorney’s fees of $4,820.53, for a total of $8,320.53. On this Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C, appeal, Constitution argues that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- My Bread Baking Co. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Starr v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Business Incentives, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Pinshaw v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 402 Rindge Corp. v. Ming TsaoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Hebner v. McMahonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- Croteau v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002