Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Forman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1991No. 485PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

We are asked to consider whether the corpus delicti rule, which prohibits criminal convictions based solely upon a confession of the accused, applies to proceedings involving summary offenses. We hold the rule applicable and accordingly reverse judgment of sentence and direct that the defendant be discharged.

At the conclusion of a trial de novo in the Court of Common Pleas of Bradford County, Kenneth B. Forman was found guilty of the summary offense of Unlawful Use of Lights While Hunting, 34 Pa.C.S. § 2310(a)(2). He was immediately sentenced to pay a fine of $600.00 and costs.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. WareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. TurzaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. ByrdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZugaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. McMullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. VerticelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. McMullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. BuckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API