Legal Opinion

A. Miner Contracting, Inc. v. Toho-Tolani County Improvement District

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 19, 2013No. 1 CA-CV 10-0665PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PHILIP HALL, Judge

(Retired).*

¶ 1 This ease involves a construction contract dispute between A. Miner Contracting, Inc. (“Miner”) and the Toho-Tolani County Improvement District and Coconino County (collectively, “the District”). In granting summary judgment to the District, the trial court found that the District’s previous finding that Miner had defaulted on its contractual obligations was conclusive as to Miner’s claims and defenses in its contract litigation with the District, thus barring Miner’s subsequent claims against the District under the doctrine of res judicata. The trial…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Abiele Contracting, Inc. v. New York City School Construction AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony SocietyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Zancanaro v. CrossArizona Supreme Court · 1959

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Okrie v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Excel Underground, Inc. v. Brant Lake Sanitary DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Focus point/kantor v. johnson/oak AcresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. Cook v. GrebeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Bishara v. US BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API