Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cushman & Wakefield Inc. v. 214 East 49th Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 2, 1996Published

1Dissent

Murphy, P. J. (dissenting).

The evidence adduced at the trial of this matter showed that after trying unsuccessfully for two years to sell its commercial building located at 214 East 49th Street through its managing agent, Harris Stein, the defendant, in February of 1988, entered into a brokerage agreement with plaintiff Cushman & Wakefield. That agreement provided in relevant part that plaintiff would have the exclusive right to sell the 214 East 49th Street property and that if the property was at any time subsequent to the agreement purchased by a prospect solicited within the agreement’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Slatt v. SlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Laba v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Morlee Sales Corp. v. Manufacturers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Lamphear v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. In re the Estate of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API