Legal Opinion
Friedrich v. U.S. Computer Services
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 3, 1991No. 90-1615PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GAWTHROP, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Paul Friedrich, Roger Hall, Tom Harahan, Roseanne Saunders, Richard Schaefer, Jack Wasneski, and Steve Zizza, who are current or former employees of defendant, U.S. Computer Services, which operates under the name “CableData”, brought this action against CableData seeking overtime compensation allegedly owed to them under the Fair Labor Standards Act, (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, and Pennsylvania law. 1 Defendant now moves for summary judgment, arguing that its pay practices are excluded from the overtime requirements of the FLSA,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Morris v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Friedrich v. U.S. Computer ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Friedrich v. U.S. Computer Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Foster v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Anderson v. Timber Products Inspection, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2004
- Friedrich v. Computer ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.