Legal Opinion

Richardson v. International Pottery Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 19, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

This suit was instituted by the International Pottery Company against Richardson to recover damages for the alleged disturbance of an easement claimed by the pottery company in a certain basin property owned by Richardson in the city of Trenton.

Richardson is the owner of a coal and wood yard of which the said basin is a part. The basin was formerly connected with the Delaware and Raritan canal by a passage through the canal bank. This passage was bridged by a swinging bridge, which served as part of the towpath for the canal company. This…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burr v. MillsNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Perry v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Winfield, Etc., Corp. v. Middlesex, Etc., Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Conover v. Atlantic City Sewerage Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  3. Outlook Hotel Co. v. St. JohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
  4. Paterson, Newark & New York Railroad v. Town Council of NutleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
  5. Board of Chosen Freeholders v. New York Bay RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API