Legal Opinion

Cape Romain Contractors, Inc. v. Wando E., LLC

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 14, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2011-197207; No. 27298PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge

This case arises from a construction dispute. The contract between the general contractor and subcontractor provided for arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act. When a complaint was filed, Appellant Sean Barnes, the general contractor, and Appellant Wando E., the property owner, sought to enforce the construction contract’s arbitration clause. The trial court refused to compel arbitration on the basis that the contract did not sufficiently impact interstate commerce. We find the trial court erred in finding the parties’ transaction had an insufficient nexus to interstate commerce…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dean v. Heritage Healthcare of Ridgeway, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  2. Smith v. D.R. Horton, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  3. Hall v. Green Tree Servicing, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  4. Portage Park Capital, LLC v. A.L.L. Masonry Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2024
  5. Damico v. Lennar Carolinas, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API