Smith v. D.R. Horton, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ACTING JUSTICE TOAL:
D.R. Horton, Inc., asks this Court to reverse the court of appeals’ decision in Smith v. D.R. Horton, Inc., 403 S.C. 10, 742 S.E.2d 37 (Ct. App. 2013), affirming the circuit court’s refusal to compel arbitration between Gregory and Stephanie Smith (collectively, the Smiths) and D.R. Horton. We affirm.
Facts/Peocedukal Background
D.R. Horton is a corporation specializing in residential construction. In March 2005, the Smiths entered into a home purchase agreement (the Agreement) with D.R. Horton for the design and construction of a new home in Summerville, South Carolina.
The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Preston v. FerrerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- One Belle Hall Property Owners Ass'n v. Trammell Crow Residential Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- 315 Corley CW, LLC v. Palmetto Bluff Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024
- Aetaekayakalua Shimoyama Riley v. Samsung Electronics Home Appliances America, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2026
- Amanda Huskins v. Mungo Homes, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2024
- Bethea v. Universal Protection Service, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.