Legal Opinion
United States v. Dolliver
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 13, 2007No. 06-1279PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
After a thorough review of the record and of the parties’ submissions, we affirm.
Appellant Darrell Dolliver (“Dolliver”) challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1)(A)®. His arguments do not acknowledge that he was convicted of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, rather than use of a firearm during and in relation to a drug-trafficking crime, and he does not present any authority suggesting that his behavior here—the bartering of drugs for firearms—falls outside the reach of that statute as amended by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Turbides-LeonardoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Jermaine Raynard FrederickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Navedo-ConcepcionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Jason Cox (A/k/a "Jc") and Clinton Cox, Willie GrantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. DoodyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Jeffery L. DickersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. González-RodríguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. MahanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.