Legal Opinion

United States v. Mahan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 16, 2009No. 08-30475PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether an individual who trades drugs for guns possesses the firearms “in furtherance of’ his drug trafficking offense.

I

A

Late on the evening of November 30, 2005, Zane Isabell and Shawn Copley offered to sell several stolen firearms to William Mahan. Copley initially called his mother to gauge her interest in acquiring them; during this phone call, he ultimately spoke with Mahan, who was living with Copley’s mother at the time. Based on Copley’s conversation with Mahan, Copley and Isabell drove to his mother’s house with the stolen firearms. After…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Watson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. Leon CombsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Pedro L. Castillo and Frank RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. DoodyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Jeffery L. DickersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. GurkaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API