Stockstill v. Bennett
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.
This case involves the sufficiency of the description of certain lands in an assessment and tax sale. The Chancery Court of Pearl River County upheld the validity of the description when aided by parol evidence as authorized by Miss. Code of 1942, Secs. 9773 and 9775. The former statute provides that a failure to observe the requirements in making up the land rolls shall not vitiate any assessment “if the land be so described as to be identified; and it shall be sufficient identification of land to describe it as the land of . . . (person owning or claiming it), occupied by . . .; or that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seward v. DoganMississippi Supreme Court · 1945
- Slush v. PattersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1947
- Jefferson v. WalkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
- Martin v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
- Reber v. DowlingMississippi Supreme Court · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Humes, Ncm, Etc. v. KraussMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Mississippi State Highway Commission v. CaseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1965