Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. First National Bank

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 6, 1999No. 96-P-1654PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlannery, J.

The plaintiffs, interested parties in a nominee *99trust owning certain mortgaged property in Hopkinton, challenge the adequacy of notice and selling price in connection with the foreclosure sale conducted by the defendant, The First National Bank of Boston (bank). A Land Court judge, following a two-day trial, entered judgment for the defendants. We affirm.

The subsidiary facts are not in dispute. As of 1993, Mark and Rose Marinelli owned a roughly thirty-five-acre parcel of undeveloped land (locus), which the Marinellis had mortgaged to the bank to secure a promissory note. On May 28, 1993,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. DesLauries v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Clark v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Pemstein v. StimpsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  4. Chartrand v. Newton Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Resolution Trust Corp v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Farmer v. Alaska USA Title Agency, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Chaves v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  3. Burke v. Sun America, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2000
  4. Caroline Joyce RellstabUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
  5. Culley v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API