Legal Opinion
Michael Thompson v. Dublin Police Services, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 23, 2026No. 4:24-cv-00475Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL THOMPSON, Case No. 24-cv-00475-ASK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION FOR 9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 DUBLIN POLICE SERVICES, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 53, 61, 70 Defendants. 11 12 California law permits limited residential marijuana cultivation under certain 13 circumstances. In this civil rights action, Plaintiff Michael Thompson alleges, among other things, 14 that Defendant Detective Brandon obtained a search warrant by lying about the number and 15 location of certain marijuana plants, thereby resulting in the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.