Legal Opinion

State v. Penix

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1987No. 86-1723PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

I

We first turn to appellee’s cross-appeal attacking his conviction. Upon a review of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the exhaustive opinion of the court of appeals, we find no prejudicial error in the guilt phase of the proceedings. Therefore, we affirm ap-pellee’s conviction for aggravated murder.

II

We now turn to the penalty phase of the proceedings. During this phase, the trial jury must “determine whether the aggravating circumstances the offender was found guilty of committing are sufficient to outweigh the mitigating factors present in the case.” R.C. 2929.03(D)(2). A sentence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Skipper v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. John W. Byrd, Jr. v. Terry L. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API