Legal Opinion

Gill v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1950Published

1Per curiam

The order allowing time to amend had the effect of retaining the cause on the docket. So then, the taproot of defendants’ exception is the refusal to dismiss the action. But no appeal lies from a refusal to dismiss. Johnson v. Insurance Co., 215 N.C. 120, 1 S.E. 2d 381. The order entered was interlocutory and discretionary. G.S. 1-131, 162. That there was no motion to be allowed to amend, if such be required, is not made to appear. Teague v. Oil Co., 232 N.C. 469. Appeal therefrom was premature, Johnson v. Insurance Co., supra; Utilities Com. v. R. R., 223 N.C. 840, 28 S.E. 2d 490; Privette…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Teague v. Siler City Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Johnson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Privette v. PrivetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Utilities Com. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API