Legal Opinion
Centennial Bank v. Sokol
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided July 30, 2025No. 1:24-cv-22927Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 1:24-cv-22927-ALTMAN CENTENNIAL BANK, Plaintiff, v. JULIA SOKOL AND YOSSI SOKOL, Defendants. ___________________________/ ORDER This matter comes before this Court on the Plaintiff Centennial Bank (“Centennial”)’s Motion for Default Final Judgment (“the Motion”) [ECF No. 46] against the Defendants Julia Sokol and Yossi Sokol (the “Sokols” or the “Defendants”). This Court has carefully reviewed the Motion, the record, and the applicable law. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED. I. Factual and Procedural…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- David Sapuppo, Theresa Sapuppo v. Allstate Floridian Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.