Legal Opinion
In Re the Discipline of Pendleton
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 26, 2000No. 990317PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSON, Associate Chief Justice:
{1 Gary Pendleton appeals from the district court's judgment disbarring him for misconduct involving his possession, use, procurement, and distribution of methamphetamine. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
2 Pendleton was licensed to practice law in the state of Utah and was engaged full time in the practice of law in Washington County, Utah, when criminal charges were filed against him. On April 28, 1997, he was charged in Fifth District Court with eriminal solicitation to deliver a controlled substance, distribution of a controlled substance (two counts), and possession or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte National Enameling and Stamping CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- R & R Energies v. Mother Earth Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. GamblinUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Langeland v. Monarch Motors, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
- Askew v. HardmanUtah Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spratley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
- D.M. v. S.H.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2009
- Shaheen v. County of MathewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- In re the Discipline of Trujillo, No. 4428Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- Office of Professional Conduct v. Dahlquist (In Re Discipline of Dahlquist)Utah Supreme Court · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.