Legal Opinion

In re Penthouse International Ltd.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 10, 1977No. 77-524PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Appeal from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board affirming the trademark examiner’s final refusal to register applicant’s mark. We reverse.

Background

Appellant Penthouse International Ltd. (Penthouse) seeks to register on the Principle Register, for items of jewelry, including cuff links, tie fasteners, key rings, bracelets and pendants, in former U.S. Class 28, this stylized key logo:

Penthouse’s parent application sought registration for goods in former U.S. Classes 22, 28, and 38. The parent application was split into two divisional applications. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Application of Deister Concentrator Company, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  2. Application of Mogen David Wine CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  3. Application of McIlhenny CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  4. In re Honeywell, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  5. Application of Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc. v. Pussycat Cinema, Ltd. And Michael ZaffaranoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  3. Lesportsac, Inc. v. K Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. In re Morton-Norwich Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  5. Thomas & Betts Corporation and Thomas & Betts Holdings, Inc. v. Panduit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API