Legal Opinion
Sweet v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 28, 1994No. 94-775PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
644 So.2d 176 (1994)
Ruth SWEET, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-775.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
October 28, 1994.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Anne Moorman Reeves, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
COBB, Judge.
On this appeal, the defendant contends that several conditions of probation were illegally imposed and should be stricken, even in the absence of a contemporaneous objection.
In Watson v. State, 641 So.2d 432…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Cleveland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Watson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- F.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holmes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Justice v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Mantz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Dumas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Holly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995