Dumas v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a sentence. Because it was a departure from the sentencing guidelines and no reason was given for the departure, we vacate the sentence. State v. Davis, 630 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994). The requirement to pay money to “First Step” is error. Fyler v. State, 645 So.2d 108 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); McLeod v. State, 645 So.2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Sweet v. State, 644 *700So.2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Mittner v. State, 648 So.2d 139 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Murray v. State, 647 So.2d 313 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Avallone v.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Tibero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Armstrong v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Botts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Eckenrode v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.