Legal Opinion
In re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
Judicial Council of The Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2011No. Nos. 10-90018, 10-90019PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*962ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Complainant, a pro se prisoner, alleges that a district judge and a magistrate judge “departed from prevailing legal standards” and “refused to apply Ninth Circuit and Supreme Court case law authorities” when making various substantive and procedural rulings in his Bivens action. These charges relate to the merits of the judges’ rulings and must be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 352(b)(l)(A)(ii); Judicial-Conduct Rule 11(c)(1)(B); In re Charge of Judicial Misconduct, 685 F.2d 1226, 1227 (9th Cir. Jud. Council 1982).
Complainant tries to avoid this mqrits-related bar by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Charge of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Judicial Conduct and DisabilityUnited States Judicial Conference Committee · 2008
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Usdc-NvrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015