Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Smith v. Dieffenbach

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1854PublishedCited by 10 opinions

At Nisi Prius, coram Lewis, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The facts fully appear in the opinion delivered

by Lewis, J.

This is a motion by Ignatius Steinmetz and Peter Fasel, in the nature of an application by each for an examination pro interesse suo, in order that their several interests may be protected, and the writ of assistance discharged as to them.

A brief history of the case as it stands upon the record, may be necessary to a proper understanding of the merits of this motion. A dispute had existed for some years respecting the manner of conducting the elections of trustees, and the right to possession, under the charter of 4th October, 1788,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Murray v. BallouNew York Court of Chancery · 1815

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Lieberum v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Moschell v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  4. Ehler v. TurnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1882
  5. Den ex dem. McEowen v. DrakeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1835

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API