Legal Opinion
Ehler v. Turner
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided February 15, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions
On application for injunction, heard on bill, answei*, affidavits- and order to show cause.
1Opinion of the Court
Van Fleet, V. C.
The complainant seeks to have the defendants restrained by injunction from causing to be sold certain chattels upon which she claims to hold a chattel mortgage, and which the defendants have procured to be seized under an execution. The chattels are owned by two sons of the complainant. They executed a mortgage to the complainant on the chattels in controversy, August 17th, 1880. The mortgage was filed on the day of its date in the proper office. It was not acknowledged, and could not therefore be recorded under the act of 1880. P. L. of 1880 p. 266. The defendants recovered a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth ex rel. Smith v. DieffenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wisner Mfg. Co. v. Second National, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Lion Shoe Co. v. PriceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Jarecki v. Manville Bakery, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Sherman v. Union County, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931