Legal Opinion

Richard v. Hunter

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1949No. 31487PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

A single question of law is presented to this court by this appeal: In an action to recover damages for trespass upon land in possession of plaintiff under lease will a verdict by a jury, which finds for the plaintiff and against the defendants in “the sum of none dollars, for compensatory damages; * * * and # * * the sum of two hundred dollars for punitive damages,” authorize the entering of a judgment for the plaintiff thereon?

The plaintiff claims that since his cause of action was one for trespass on land, the finding in his favor determined the issue and established that his legal right…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Hess v. MarinariWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Toler v. CassinelliWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Newman v. RobsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Livingston v. Utah-Colorado Land & Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1940

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  4. Bishop v. GrdinaOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Wagenheim v. Alexander Grant & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API