Legal Opinion
Garrison v. General Motors Corporation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 22, 1963No. 1440-60-ECPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRARY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek inspection, under the provisions of Rule 34, F.R.Civ.P., of communications between an officer of defendant General Motors Corporation (hereafter referred to as GMC) and an attorney in the corporation’s patent section, as well as communications between attorneys in the patent section and communications between patent section attorneys and corporation employees and representatives' of the company’s Saginaw Steering Gear Division, hereafter referred to as SSGD.
All of the attorneys in the patent section working in Michigan were members of the Michigan Bar…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- City of Philadelphia v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Holm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Honorable Bernard M. Decker, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.