Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pypiak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, J.:

¶ 1 The Commonwealth appeals from an order directing Appellee’s admission into an Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) program. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the trial court erred in ordering Appellee’s admission into the program. We reverse.

¶ 2 Appellee was charged with two counts of driving under the influence, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731(a)(1) and 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731(a)(4)© and applied for Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD). The Luzerne County District Attorney denied the application following the arresting officer’s objection to the request. Appellee’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. StrangesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SohnleitnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Com. v. H.C.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Com. v. Parnes, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Com. v. Worzel, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API