Legal Opinion

O'Banion v. Morris Plan Industrial Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1948No. 33160PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This action was instituted to recover damages from defendant for conversion of an automobile, together with expenses necessarily incurred in locating the car after its removal by the original purchaser from the State of Kentucky and subsequent sale to defendant herein.

July 7, 1945, one Nash purchased the automobile from the King Motor Sales in Louisville, Ky., and executed a conditional sales contract for $559.08 covering the balance due upon the purchase price. The same day this contract was assigned to plaintiff herein. Acknowledgment of the purchaser’s (mortgagor’s) signature, as well as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bunch v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. Baker v. Farmers & Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Burke v. First Nat. Bank of YukonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Maitland v. Republic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Park Nat. Bank of Sulphur v. DouglassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Fin. Co., Inc. v. CarneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Seale Motor Co. Inc. v. StoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  3. In Re StewartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2009
  4. Williams v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2009
  5. Seale Motor Co. Inc. v. StoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API