Legal Opinion

Carter v. Novotny

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1989No. S-2645, S-3049PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

The principal issue presented in this appeal is whether the superior court erred in awarding shared custody of Heidi Novotny to David A. Novotny, her father, and Nancy R. Carter, her maternal aunt, after having determined that it would be detrimental to Heidi to continue her physical placement with her father. Initially, the court awarded shared custody of Heidi to both Nancy and David, physical custody being placed with David. However, following a second hearing at which additional evidence was elicited, the court transferred physical custody from David to Nancy,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Turner v. PannickAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Horutz v. HorutzAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Carle v. CarleAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. E. A. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Carson v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Watkins v. NelsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  2. Evans v. McTaggartAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. McDermott v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. C.R.B. v. C.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. J.W. v. R.J.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API