Barrett v. McHattie

Plaintiff brought this action seeking to recover damages for the alleged breach of a contract for the purchase of lambs for future delivery. The case was tried before the court sitting with a jury. A verdict was rendered by the jury in favor of defendants O'Connell and Schotte, and against the plaintiff. Judgment was entered in conformity with the verdict. A motion for new trial was made, heard and denied. The appeal is from the judgment.

By his complaint plaintiff alleged that on March 26, 1934, he was the owner of approximately 2,000 head of mixed lambs, on which day the defendant McHattie…