Commonwealth v. Barnes & Tucker Co.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Bowman,
In reversing this Court and remanding the case to us for further proceedings consistent with its opinion, Commonweath v. Barnes & Tucker Company, 455 Pa. 392, 319 A.2d 871 (1974), the Supreme Court in our analysis of its opinion, has unequivocally declared:(1) that the discharge of acid mine drainage from Mine No. 15 into the waters of the Commonwealth constitutes a public nuisance at common law as well as under the applicable statutory law, and that relief could be granted under either of these theories.(2) that the absence of facts supporting concepts of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Kelly v. Washington Ex Rel. Foss Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. SaxlSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gambone v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- City of Philadelphia v. Stepan Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. Barnes & Tucker Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- District of Columbia v. FowlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- United States v. Union Gas Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.