Legal Opinion

Paasch v. City of Safety Harbor

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided April 26, 1995No. 93-1717-CIV-T-25(B)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

THOMAS G. WILSON, United States Magistrate Judge.

This suit arises under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq. The plaintiff John Paasch contends that he needed leave to treat a serious health condition and that his employer, the defendant City of Safety Harbor, violated the Act in its response to his needs. The defendant, relying primarily on the plaintiffs resignation, asserts that there was no violation of the Act. Both sides have, in effect, filed motions for summary judgment. Consideration of the parties’ submissions, as illuminated by the arguments of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Christie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  3. Michael W. Alvarado v. Ronald D. Picur, Special Administrator of the Estate of Robert Curry, 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Venero v. City of Tampa, Fla.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
  5. Venero v. TampaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beal v. Rubbermaid Commercial Products Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1997
  2. Beno v. United Telephone Co. of FloridaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1997
  3. Cross v. Southwest Recreational Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1998
  4. Walthall v. Fulton County School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1998
  5. Nelson v. City of Cranston Ex Rel. McAteerDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API