Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Fontaine Ferry Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 8, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

The appellants, Edward Hicks and Ruby Braden, were injured while riding in a Loop-O-Plane at an amusement park operated by Fontaine Ferry Enterprises, Incorporated. They filed separate actions for damages, but the cases were consolidated for trial. At the conclusion of all the evidence a verdict was directed in favor of the appellee. Reversal is urged on the ground that there was sufficient evidence to warrant the submission of the case to the jury. -

The appellants contend that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies, since the Loop-O-Plane was under the exclusive…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chadwick v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Stacey v. StonerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Fannin v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  4. Bee's Old Reliable Shows, Inc. v. Maupin's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  5. Elcomb Coal Co. v. Gray's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ferrell v. HellemsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API