Legal Opinion

Hannah v. Hannah

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1992No. 89-SC-960-DGPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBSON, Justice.

Movant, Gertrude Hannah, brought an action against her deceased husband’s brother to recover $50,000 that her husband had transferred to a joint bank account in his name and his brother’s name. The money belonged to the decedent, and the transfer occurred after the marriage. The widow’s suit was based solely on the theory that the transfer was an oral trust for her benefit. The trial court held otherwise.

She also argued, although not as part of the pleadings, that she should have the right to rescind the transaction based on the claim that the transfer was made with the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Perry v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. Bayes v. HowesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  4. Smith v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Harris v. RockKentucky Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanders v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998
  2. Henderson v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
  3. Kenneth Brandon Keith Individually v. Debra Cross of the Estate of Judith Magers KeithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API