Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Meehan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1993No. 03300PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the order of the lower court denying appellant’s request for collateral relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546. 1 The sole issue presented for review is whether appellant validly waived his constitutionally guaranteed right to be represented by counsel at the PCRA hearing. In addition to the issue raised in his brief, appellant has filed a pro se application for relief in which he requests the appointment of new counsel. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the order of the PCRA court and deny appellant’s pro se…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. BasemoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. MonicaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. IngramSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. BlystoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. StosselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API