Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stossel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 2011No. 1056 WDA 2010PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

Leonard F. Stossel, Appellant, appeals pro se from the June 8, 2010 order denying as untimely his first petition for post-conviction relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546. We conclude that the PCRA court erred in not holding a hearing in accordance with Commonwealth v. Grazier, 552 Pa. 9, 713 A.2d 81 (1998), to ensure that Stossel intelligently, knowingly, and voluntarily waived his right to representation. Accordingly, we remand for the PCRA court to conduct such a hearing.

Stossel entered a nolo contendere plea on September 5, 2006,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. DavidoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HenkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. FigueroaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. WillisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Betts, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API