Legal Opinion
Gerber v. Hickman
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 23, 2000No. Civ. S991315 FCD JFM PPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DAMRELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff William Gerber, a state prisoner, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendant Rodney Hickman, Acting Warden of Mule Creek State Prison, violated his constitutional right to procreate by refusing to allow him to artificially inseminate his wife. Plaintiff also contends that defendant’s refusal violated his rights under CaLPenal Code §§ 2600 and 2601. Defendant moves to dismiss, or in the alternative for summary judgment of, plaintiffs claims.
This matter was referred to a United States…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- William Gerber v. Rodney Hickman, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- William Gerber v. Rodney Hickman, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- William Gerber v. Rodney Hickman, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- William Gerber v. Rodney Hickman, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001