Legal Opinion
Incorporated Village of Muttontown v. Friscia
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSol Waohtlbr, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff village to enjoin the defendants from using a stable located on their premises in a manner alleged to be in violation of the village Building Zone Ordinance.
*913The defendants are the owners of approximately eight acres of property in the Village of Muttontown situated in a Residence A-l District. Article V, section 5.0 of the subject ordinance prohibits the use of such premises for business purposes. The ordinance further provides that a stable for the commercial boarding of horses may only be maintained when authorized as a variance or special…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Monument Garage Corp. v. LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Collins v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Village of Old Westbury v. FosterNew York Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Town of Huntington v. Park Shore Country Day Camp of Dix Hills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Inc. Village of Asharoken v. PitassyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Incorporated Village of Muttontown v. FrisciaNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. HoytSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970