Legal Opinion

Incorporated Village of Muttontown v. Friscia

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSteven B. Derounian, J.

In this action to enjoin the defendants from using the stable on their premises, such use aEeged by plaintiff village to be in violation of the Village Zoning Ordinance, defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied. 'Plaintiff’s cross motion to grant summary judgment in its favor and to dismiss the first affirmative defense contained in the amended answer is granted in part and denied in part, in accordance with the short-form order signed herewith.

Defendants’ property was, until 1954, located within the unincorporated area of the Town of Oyster Bay and subject…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Long Island University v. TappanNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Long Island University v. TappanNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Long Island University v. TarpanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Incorporated Village of Atlantic Beach v. Town of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Incorporated Village of Muttontown v. FrisciaNew York Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Park View Heights Corporation v. City of Black JackDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API