Legal Opinion

Hendler v. Intelecom USA, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 15, 1997No. 9:95-cv-02490PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SEYBERT, District Judge:

The instant action was commenced by plaintiff Stephen Hendler claiming that defendant Intelecom U.S., Inc. (“Intelecom”) unlawfully discriminated and retaliated against him because of his disability, in violation of both the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the New York Human Rights Law. Pending before the Court is Intelecom’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies in part and grants in part Intelecom’s motion.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The following facts are not in dispute.

Plaintiff Stephen Hendler…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Kevin J. Gilday v. Mecosta CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Fuller v. Iowa Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  4. Micari v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  5. Edwards v. Brookhaven Science Associates, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API