Legal Opinion

Charles L. Mull & Sons v. Dooley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 14, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Keokuk District Court. — Hon. A. R. Dewey, Judge. Action to foreclose certain chattel mortgages. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

The defendant Dooley was, in 1889, and up to January 7, 1890, in the business of merchandising at What Cheer, Iowa. Prior to October 1, 1889, he became indebted to appellee Grillfoy (his father-in-law) for money loaned. On October 1, 1889, it was agreed and understood between them that Dooley should secure his indebtedness to Grillfoy by executing a chattel mortgage. Dooley was to have said mortgage executed, and to file it for record. Grillfoy requested Beem, a notary public, to draft the mortgage, and leave it with Dooley after it was executed. Grillfoy told the notary the amount to be put…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Day v. GriffithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
  2. Goll & Frank Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  3. Cobb v. ChaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. KirkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Assignment of Lemert v. McKibbenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Moore v. ChilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Atkinson v. McNiderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Dova v. HancockSupreme Court of Florida · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API