McGee v. McGee
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
In Dorman v. Wayah Valley Ranch, Inc., 6 N.C. App. 497, 170 S.E. 2d 509 (1969), this Court reiterated the three requirements of an easement by implication: (1) title shall have been separated between two tracts, one dominant and one servient; (2) before the separation took place, the use which gave rise to the easement shall have been so long continued and so obvious or manifest as to show that it was meant to be permanent; and (3) the easement shall be necessary to the beneficial enjoyment of the land granted or retained. Also, see Webster, Real Estate Law in North Carolina, §…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Potter v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Dorman v. Wayah Valley Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tower Development Partners v. ZellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- CDC Pineville, LLC v. UDRT of North Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Heritage Communities of North Carolina, Inc. v. Powers, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Adelman v. GanttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Jones v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.